Panel Discussions
Following the scientific
overview presented in the Plenary
Session the group broke out into three discussion sessions
focused on the science and technologies specific to abating three
important sources of nutrient loading in the basin: stormwater,
septic systems, and wastewater treatment facilities. The discussion
sessions each contain a small group of invited expert panelists who
short presentations on the problems from their perspective and a
moderator who guided subsequent discussions. The goal for each
session was to build a consensus of opinion and a set of specific
recommendations for the best course of action necessary to solve the
problems.
Discussion Session 1:
Stormwater Runoff
The Stormwater panel addressed water quality impacts on the Wakulla
springshed stemming from stormwater discharge into the basin;
correlation of discharge with precipitation; relationship between
land use and the quantity and quality of runoff and use of Florida's
stormwater program and BMP's to address these impacts; nutrient
loading; local efforts to reduce stormwater pollution; and, the role
of phosphorus vs. nitrate concentrations as triggers to
eutrophication and Hydrilla and algal growth. The panel evaluated
current stormwater runoff management practices and discussed
field-tested and new and innovative practices that offer more
environmentally sound and/or cost effective alternatives to
stormwater management in karst. Panelists included:
|
|
|
|
|
| Martin
Wanielista |
University
of Central Florida,
Florida Stormwater Academy |
|
pdf |
bio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Session 2: Septic
Systems
The Septic System panel addressed the effectiveness of septic
systems as wastewater treatment methods; the prevalence and density
of these systems in the Wakulla springshed; suitability of local
soils as drain fields; mounding as an alternative for drain field
operation; multi-family and commercial facilities vs. single
dwelling systems; aerobic vs. anaerobic systems; and the ideal or
recommended protocols for system monitoring and maintenance. The
panel also discussed the latest innovations in the manufacture and
installation of septic systems and compared these systems with local
or regional sewage treatment plants from the environmental, public
health and economical perspectives. The panel reviewed and evaluated
current practices of domestic wastewater management in the
springshed and discussed best management practices that may reduce
current detrimental impacts on the watershed. Panelists included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alex
Mahon |
Leon
County Health Department |
|
|
bio |
|
| Brian
Crawford |
Wakulla
County Health Department |
notes |
|
bio |
|
|
|
|
Discussion Session 3:
The Wastewater panel evaluated the effectiveness of existing
wastewater treatment facilities in maintaining the ecological health
and integrity of the Wakulla springshed and discussed alternative
practices that might be considered by decision makers, within the
local and State entities responsible for managing this community's
wastewater and protecting its natural resources. Specific topics
included: the level of treatment needed before spray irrigation,
i.e. secondary, tertiary or advanced wastewater treatment (AWT);
ideal crops and application rates for nutrient uptake; seasonal
variations and the role of karst formations in the successful
operation of spray fields or other land application methods for
treating domestic wastewater. Panelists included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Richard
Drew |
FDEP
Wastewater Facilities |
|
pdf |
bio |
|
| Ellie
Whitney |
Friends
of Wakulla Spring |
|
pdf |
bio |
|
|
|
|
 |