February 7 - 8, 2007
Tallahassee

• Final Report

• A - Agenda
• B - Meeting Guidelines

Presentations: Mapping Technologies, Scales and Resolution

• Bottom and Sub-Bottom Acoustics
• C - Bottom Acoustics - Stan Locker, USF
• D - Seismic - Jim Flocks, USGS
• E - Multibeam - Jane Denny, USGS
• Remote Sensing
• F - Charts - Eddie Culpepper, USCOE
• G - EAARL/Atris - Amar Nayegandhi and Dave Zawada, USGS
• H - Hyperspectral Mapping - Charles Kovach - FDEP
• I - Satellite - Frank Muller-Karger, USF
• Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) as Mapping Tools
• J - Autonomous Underwater Vehicles - John Kloske, USF
• Video and Images (zipped)
• K - Autonomous Underwater Vehicles - Manhar Dhanak, FAU
• Video of Algal Bloom
• New Mapping Technologies
• L - Hybrid Mapping Tool and LIDAR - Sam Purkis and Greg Foster, Nova
• Demonstration
• M - Streaming Resistivity - Chris Reich, USGS

Presentations: Agency Mapping Programs, Needs, and Priorities

• State Agencies
• N - GAME - Dave Reed
• O - FWCC - Kathleen O'Keife
• P - FDEP - Seth Blitch
• Q - FGS - Ron Hoenstine
• R - DACS - Sherman Wilhelm
• S - NWFWMD - Graham Lewis
• T - SJRWMD - Robert Virnstein
• U - SWFWMD - Kris Kaufmann
• V - SFWMD - Cecilia Conrad
• W - FNEPs - Catherine Corbett
• Federal Agencies
• X - USGS - Jack Kindinger
• Y - NOAA - Steve Rohmann
• Z - NMFS - Jennifer Moore
• AA - NPS - Mary Patterson
• BB - TNC - Mary Bryant

• CC - Matrix of Commonalities

Breakout Groups

• M1: Commonalities Among Mapping Priorities
• M2: Coordination of Mapping Activities
• M3: Technologies
• M4: Designation of Bioregions
• M5: Baseline Mapping Data

• Mapping Priorities

Presentations for Classifying Habitats for Mapping

• Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard - Becky Allee, NOAA-CMECS
• Table
• NOAA Coral Classification Scheme - Steve Robinson, NOAA
• SCHEME - System for Classification of Habitats in Estuarine and Marine Environments - Dave Palandro, FWCC
• Discussion

Plenary Questions

1. How could the new data collected be made available to those needing it?
2. How should priorities be updated to allow for future events? How often should this occur?
3. Is there a better way to collect stakeholder mapping priorities?
4. Is there a benefit to the federal agencies establishing a single overall federal priority for mapping within Florida?